Browsing Category

Product Marketing

Out telling stories and finding examples

After working with a company over the last couple of weeks to adjust their message in the marketplace, I continue to realize it is tough stuff no matter how many times I’ve done it.  Every engagement is a little different, but the story hurdle is present in just about every business.  I’ve typically been challenged by most clients to get their teams to understand that marketing is always about telling a story. Often it is a new story; most often it is a more simple story.

No matter what you are marketing, it represents some type of story which highlights a single theme or idea.  How to save money, how to improve your effectiveness, how to improve your quality of life – all them threads which position a product.  Thanks to ethos3 @ slideshare.net, I now have a pitch I can point people to that is engaging and an independent validation.  At least this covers the corporate capabilities part.

View SlideShare presentation or Upload your own. (tags: rockstar maverick)

One of the hardest things to do, as an independant contractor, is to convince the person with the check that some of their other stories are too complicated or least not connected.  Most of my clients have an inside-out view of the market and often suffer from the category killer disease (CKD).  CKD is when no matter what product category they are in, their revenues or what “rank” they have, their product is the best.  The reality is sometimes it comes down to that a product is the cheapest, the easiest to use, the highest quality or maybe actually the best. The trick is to connect these benefits to the story or single idea.

The Social Marketing Construct: Evolving Brands and Emerging Realities

Download the Social Marketing Construct

Why we wrote it:

After sitting in a Pragmatic course taught by David Meerman Scott, I came up with the idea that I just might wanna write something a little more substantial than a blog post.  David spent a good deal of effort in his New Rules of Marketing course on the value of an eBook, so I thought that might be a lofty pursuit.  I clearly needed some help; so I engaged my personal advisory board for input and volleyed ideas. We centered on brand as a construct in the context of social media adoption, more or less.

Sheryl Altschuler was kind enough to offer her experience in launching brands online for this project.  Sheryl was critical in simplifying the concepts in the eBook and developing the Social Marketing ContractChris Carfi was kind enough to write a foreword and to provide his thoughts on what would be helpful to marketers given the emerging business realities. Clearly interesting things are afoot in the evolving social marketplace. The social impact on brand management and equity represents an opportunity for marketers to re-align their focus against The Social Marketing Construct.

Many thanks to those who helped as well as those who take the time to download and take a look.  If you find it particularly useful, feel free to let some folks know about it.  The concepts in the book are a continuing area of interest for both Sheryl and me, so feedback appreciated.

Cheers!

~jon

Sometimes customer loyalty and service Hertz

The Things About Brands

Brand management and development is a serious investment for folks and a good deal of the effort is put forth in making sure the whole product or service a brand represents puts forth the right message to the market.  For me a brand’s promise on service is a critical buying criteria for most things, especially when it comes to leisure.

Travel as an Experience of Brands

Travel is about the most brand aware segment for me – I am just plain brand centric with my travel decisions.  Amex, Marriott and Hertz typically means everything is going to work out.  That being said I’ve seen some changes in my user experience in the last 12 months with key brands I choose to work with in the travel industry, which may be a response to the economy or inconsistent execution on common processes.  Doesn’t matter what the drivers – brand promises are more like concepts than promises it seems of late on my travels.   Recently I’ve decided I’m over a certain hotel chain micro-brand and now it appears that the economic downturn or just an over zealous regional manager looking to make his/her bonus/free Applebee’s $25 Gift Card in Reno just may make me switch my preferred car renting company from Hertz.

A Car Rental Reality

I’ve been renting with Hertz for nearly a decade and conservatively I’ve spent over $20K, which may not be a lot in the scheme of things, but kinda feels like a big number with a single vendor to me.  My most recent transaction probably won’t make me move from the brand since I think the key brand attributes are still intact:

  • A reasonable price – not great price, but worth the value
  • A well organized and coordinated frequent traveler program
  • Generally OK cars regardless of the situation – vacation, business or group travel.

The way I see it, if you can find a single company who can provide a service consistently regardless of location or the use case that’s a pretty important thing as a traveler, even if it costs a little more.  All you need is one username and password, one process to learn…..  My most recent trip started no different for the most part, but an interesting use case in customer engagement emerged from my most recent vacation rental with Hertz from even before I got my keys.

My experience online was great, got a van, needed a van.  With Burning Man in the region I expected to get above average rates, but not with Hertz an unadulterated price book was made available and I had a reservation in minutes.  I was definitely pleased to see that Hertz wouldn’t jack rates insanely because of Burning Man, as other vendors did with like product in services during the period.

My Hertz experience varied from the start, I had to pick up my keys instead of strolling straight to the car, but this happens at small airports and the service was good at the counter, albeit a little odd.   During the transaction there was this weird forced random Burning Man reference.  I go to lots of place and most interactions are absent a “why I was in town” when it comes to the car rental place.  Paraphrase below:

ME: Man, can you give me my keys

HIM: ID

ME: <hands id> Appreciate this <gets keys> thanks man

HIM: You going to burning man?

ME: Absolutely – be good, cheers!

Off to the car thinking these folks are certainly friendly and appear to be excited bout the influx of diverse folks for burning man – kinda cool…. I quickly find the van which I rented, drop in the bags and start getting in the car and I am greeted with the following “valued” Customer Message:

Well perhaps with this welcome as a customer I should have seen Burning Man remotely or minimally selected another vendor such as Enterprise car rental.  At this point, my car rental is becoming an increasingly emotional commercial transaction on both sides.  But with a week of vacation ahead and a little rational thought applied for a second or two, I understand that folks need to be aware that should they return a car with something that could be considered beyond normal wear and tear there might be a fee.

Good business – communicate with your customer your needs and the responsibility of the consumer.

Then I started thinking about the $175 charge, as a business guy, threatening essentially a 2X market rate should work and could represent a new little opportunistic profit center – good job Hertz!  I’m now well educated and aware there is some hyper sensitivity about Burning Man.

So just to let you know – cars get dirty on the playa.  After a week in the desert the car was a little over the top dirty and I clearly accepted the warning as somewhat valid, even if not customer centric, since it could be a bunch of work to clean.  I actually should know, I did it TWICE before turning it in.

Decision Cycle – Hertz clean for Crazy Price or Something else?

With warning in hand and a brief discussion on how to approach the situation, Em and I are off doing ROI and time benefit analysis as we head out on 80 W away Black Rock City.  From a brand perspective, you might not what your customers doing risk analysis and ROI right after a completed a commercial transaction  – just an idea…

As a math fan, I quickly figure out that is clearly more financially beneficial to detail the car myself after about 10 miles of discussion.   Well not really myself, someone else, was the plan but I figured I could ultimately contain my spend to say a $100 worst case.   So on our way out of the desert we had it detailed in Reno and the actual spend was only $90 with tip.

With that task done in full compliance of the warning it was on to Lake Tahoe for a couple of days.  Just as a point of information – did you know it’s dusty their too?  It not like the desert but dusty.  Yup, so the car did get a little more dusty on the ride to the lake and our gear added some dust and dirt into the van trunk area we notice when we left for the airport so we stopped for a second car cleaning.

After all, we already $80 already invested down this decision path. So a quick stop at self-service car wash just outside Carson City , only 20/25 miles from the airport,  made it on to the agenda.  We joked that it was an acceptable investment protection to purchase the following items/services:

  • Cleaning stuff – $7
  • Using Car Wash Vacuum – $3.50
  • Quick Rinse and Wax in the self-service wash – $4-ish
  • Paper towels – $2

In just under 15 minutes a clean car again!   Fast forward 25 minutes: An extra charge for having to detail the interior of the car was the verdict from Hertz, good news only $75.00.   At least, I didn’t get charged the whole $175 because I did a “good job” on the exterior, not my words but the cheerful manager who assessed the fine.  I actually think I did good job on the interior too, but you be the judge, sorry iPhone picture quality – the whole set is here..

photo.jpg by you.

Brand Integrity and Consistency

Fairly clean stuff is how I saw it and still do. Every car I rent in Chicago in the winter is dirtier – inside and out.  So just how did the consistency of the brands processes in Reno vary from standard, since no one actually looked at the interior of the car prior to my assessment of a fee?  Revenue? Gift Card?

I know that travel can sometimes be exciting and confusing, but I’m pretty sure no one opened a doors on any part of the vehicle prior to my being informed I was being charged for an interior detail.

The actual flow of the car return process deviated from the standard Hertz experience as soon as I was scanned – no inspection, no “would you like to leave it on the amex”, but a an immediate waive over of the shift manager or someone who was allowed to wear a white shirt instead of the outside uniform, regardless definitely a person of authority.  Actually a nice person I think, who instead of saying “Hello, how was your car?”, informs me that whilst I did a nice job on the outside I was still being charged for an interior clean.  Weird – as no one has STILL looked at the car interior yet….. After my being assessed the fee, a real inspection occurred which again complimented me on my thoroughness, this time on the engine, yet still resulted in a fee.

That’s my story no real point, except it make mes wonder if Hertz should have:

  • Raised my prices for the week to make it not such a damaging brand experience for me
  • Should have followed their traditional processes, like inspect the car first to provide some consistency
  • Not had a same store sales contest for the best shift manager who “up charges” the most details
  • Should just overall raise the rates of everyone to maintain quality of service and consistency
  • Not messaged me with the warning and made me more aware of the situation throughout the rental period, thus reducing the likelihood of my paying attention to the whole thing and just accepting that a fee was due.

I obviously don’t know all the drivers for the deviation from my typical brand experience, but the process and experience inconsistency is the most memorable for me, not the $75.  In the end, I think I’m like $5 ahead (less opportunity costs) and perhaps just a little more willing to choose another vendor.

Funny thing about loyalty is consistentcy can be more important than dollars for some….maybe not to Hertz.

Enable persona based sales

So I’ve been thinking a little more on those topics I shared and since I keep reading interesting stuff over at Adele’s site, buyerpersona.com and am always looking for ways to improve sales enablement. I thought I might should eat a little of my own dog food and address one of the questions myself — How can positioning and targeting of buyer personas improve sales execution?

Having launched products into the market a couple of times, sales enablement and readiness is one of the biggest obstacle to success in the marketplace. Messaging and tools are often the critical success items when you sends sales out into the field to represent your product. Adele’s approach is fairly straight forward – know who you are selling to and what interests your targeted buyer. A recent post that really made me think about it was Messaging to No One In particular. The gobblygook syndrome is a problem in marketing, particularly technology marketing where we all are looking for a way to differentiate.

Broad messaging is just about the same as having no messaging. Messaging for the masses is typically not the best way to go out into the marketplace and often driven by lack of product definition and understanding why your product wins in the marketplace and who it is for. To help figure this out, I ask myself three questions which help me understand the typical buyer persona or at least to prioritize them:

  • Who buys my product at a company?
  • Who influences decision cycles for my product?
  • What do these people they really care about?

Seems a little too simple, but more complex and broad based questions can skew how you go to market – at least for me – I over analyze everything. Sure you can refine with follow on questions, but typically each of these questions return less than 3 or 4 things which is a great baseline to build from.

The core messaging opportunity for marketers and product managers is know the right people to focus on and identify a simple way to speak to them. When you build a product you often leverage use cases/user personas, so why not apply a succinct set of value drivers, key differentiators and messages for the product the buyer.

Crispy Messaging For Me Please

So if big fluffy messaging platforms are the way – what should you do? Crisp it up a little, look at your core messages today, talked to sales and a few customers and see if common themes develop that would allow you to reduce the options for sales to speak to and customers to embrace. The differentiation challenge will continue to be one of those key deliverables marketers and product managers deliver to the field and the marketplace. The challenge to provide sales with a crisp understanding of who benefits from a given product or service is sorta like a twistaplot story, but once you find the ending you like you can crisp it up and make it repeatable. With a focused messaging and buyer centric packaging of the product you can help sales know when is the right time to walk from a sales engagement?

To take a little bit from the Customer Centric Selling folks – The second best salesperson isn’t the one who’s product is runner up in a bake off, but the person who exits the sales cycle first when he/she understands that it isn’t the right target. The DNA of salespeople typically doesn’t allow them to just give up, but if you can provide them with a clear set of buyer personas and product definitions, as a Product Manager, you just might make it more likely sales will focus on the right folks.

Short Attention Span Theatre

Buyers are busy and sales folks are just trying to eek out an existance and neither of these afford the marketer the opportunity to spend a good deal of time explaining why thier product is the right product. From my perspective, albeit limited, effective product management isn’t delivering the coolest product, the most feature rich product or the most enterprise scaleable solution to the marketplace – it centers on delivering the right product, with the right features for the appropriately buyer.

The goal for me at this point is to right size a solution or product for the buyer. How about you?